Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379881›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Ocular Speech Tracking Persists in Blindness, but Its Dynamics and Oculo-Cerebral Connectivity Depend on Visual Status.

Kaja Rosa Benz, Larissa Reitinger, Fabian Schmidt, Davide Bottari, Anne Hauswald, Olivier Collignon, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaja Rosa BenzCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria k.benz@bcbl.eu.
Larissa ReitingerCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Fabian SchmidtCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Davide BottariIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca 55100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-1569
Anne HauswaldCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Olivier CollignonCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto 38068, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-3550
Nathan WeiszCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While eye movements have been shown to track the speech envelope, it is unknown whether this reflects a hard-wired mechanism or one shaped by (lifetime) audiovisual experience. Further, questions remain about whether ocular tracking is modulated by speech intelligibility and which brain regions drive these synchronized eye movements. Here, we investigate ocular speech tracking in 47 (20 male), blindfolded early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals using magnetoencephalography and source-reconstructed oculomotor signals while participants listened to narrative speech of varying intelligibility. We find that oculomotor activity tracks acoustic speech features; however, while neural speech tracking is modulated by intelligibility, ocular tracking patterns remain ambiguous. Interestingly, we find effects reflected in two frequency-specific components: a low-frequency (∼1 Hz) effect present across all groups, indicating that visual experience is not required, and a high-frequency (∼6 Hz) effect reduced in early and late blind individuals. Moreover, this finding is not driven by cerebro-ocular connectivity, as late blind individuals exhibit stronger connectivity between the eyes and the left temporal cortices without a corresponding increase in ocular tracking. In conclusion, ocular speech tracking seems to respond selectively to acoustic features of speech, and does not require visual experience to develop. It may thus represent a hard-wired oculomotor mechanism within the oculo-cerebral network involved in speech processing.

Indexed as

BlindnessEye MovementsSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysSpeech Intelligibilityblindeye movementsspeech trackingvocoding

Identifiers

PMID42379881
PMCPMC13349464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.