SynthesisGut and liver2026
Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Gut and liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The role of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain due to conflicting data on virologic efficacy and long-term outcomes. Methods: This meta-analysis investigated studies reporting the sustained virologic response (SVR), recurrence, and overall survival in patients with HCC treated with DAAs. Results: Eighty-eight studies were included, comprising 8,839 patients with HCC who were treated with DAAs. The pooled SVR rate in patients with HCC was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87% to 91%). However, the SVR varied significantly depending on tumor viability; patients with non-viable HCC had the highest SVR (91%), followed by those with mixed (88%) and viable HCC (84%). The SVR was significantly lower in the HCC group than in the non-HCC group (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.98). In 28 studies reporting on recurrence outcomes, patients with HCC who were treated with DAAs had a 40% lower recurrence risk than non-DAA-treated patients (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.75). Pooled analyses of adjusted estimates showed that DAA treatment was independently associated with reduced recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.70) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.51). An SVR was linked to an improved prognosis, with lower recurrence (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.61) and mortality (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.24) risks. Conclusions: DAAs are effective in patients with HCC. Despite slightly lower SVR rates than in patients without HCC, the overall benefits support the use of antiviral therapy in patients with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.