ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Albumin to Globulin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic and Predictive Factor for Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) is a promising biomarker reflecting both the nutritional and inflammatory status in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. However, the clinical significance of AGR in patients with recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of AGR in patients with recurrent EC after esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data for 91 patients with recurrent EC who received any treatment, including best supportive care, after recurrence at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2022. The cut-off value of AGR was set at 1.4 based on previous studies and survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and treatment responses were compared between the AGR-low (<1.4) and AGR-high (≥1.4) groups.
resultsFifty-three patients were categorized into the AGR-low group and 38 into the AGR-high group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 28.6%, 12.8% and 12.8%, and 80.3%, 42.0% and 36.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age ≥75 years [hazard ratio (HR)=1.808, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.028-3.179,
conclusionAGR was an independent prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with recurrent EC. AGR may serve as a simple and clinically useful biomarker for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment strategies in patients with recurrent EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.