Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379757›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Oncological Safety of Minimally Invasive Multivisceral Resection for cT4b Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Comparison With Open Surgery.

Sho Nambara, Koji Ando, Tomoya Harima, Shinichiro Ikeda, Tetsuro Kawazoe, Hirofumi Hasuda, Kentaro Nonaka, Yuta Kasagi, Yasuo Tsuda, Yoshihiko Fujinaka and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sho NambaraDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; nambara.sho.341@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Koji AndoDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoya HarimaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shinichiro IkedaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tetsuro KawazoeDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hirofumi HasudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Clinical Research Institute Cancer Research Division, National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kentaro NonakaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuta KasagiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuo TsudaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshihiko FujinakaDepartment of Surgery, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan.
Tomonori NakanokoDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryota NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Clinical Research Institute Cancer Research Division, National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masahiko SugiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Daisuke YoshidaClinical Research Institute and Department of Surgery, National Beppu Medical Center, Beppu, Japan.
Kippei OhgakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eiji OkiDepartment of Advanced Medicine and Innovative Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Higashiku, Japan.
Tomoharu YoshizumiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimMinimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is increasingly used for rectal cancer but evidence of multivisceral resection (MVR) for cT4b disease by MIS is limited. This study compared short- and long-term outcomes between patients who underwent MIS or open MVR for advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with cT4b rectal cancer who underwent rectal resection with MVR at six institutions between 2011 and 2023 (open, n=9; MIS, n=23). Operative invasiveness, postoperative complications, and 3-year survival were evaluated.

resultsIntraoperative blood loss was lower in the MIS group than in the open group (median: 220

conclusionMIS may reduce invasiveness without compromising oncological outcomes in selected patients with cT4b rectal cancer requiring MVR.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomecT4b rectal cancerlaparoscopic surgeryminimally invasive surgerymultivisceral resectionrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42379757
PMCPMC13322046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.