Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379736›Full record

ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Textbook Outcome/Textbook Oncological Outcome for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.

Toru Aoyama, Haruhiko Cho, Aya Saito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toru Aoyama *Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan; t-aoyama@lilac.plala.or.jp.
Haruhiko Cho *Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Aya SaitoDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic surgery is an essential treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, perioperative morbidity and mortality are higher, and postoperative hospital stays are longer, than those for other gastrointestinal malignancies. Meanwhile, the quality of the perioperative surgical course affects both short- and long-term oncological outcomes in various malignancies.Recently, the concepts of textbook outcome (TO) and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) have been developed to evaluate the quality of perioperative surgical care. TO and TOO incorporate multiple perioperative elements and have been applied across various malignancies. In PDAC surgery, TO was defined in 2020 and consists of six short-term surgical outcomes: absence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III), readmission, and in-hospital mortality.Previous studies have demonstrated that achieving TO or TOO is associated with improved survival after pancreatic surgery for PDAC. To optimize pancreatic surgery for resectable PDAC, it is essential to understand the characteristics and limitations of existing studies conducted prior to the widespread adoption of TO and TOO. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives of TO and TOO in pancreatic surgery.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomeadjuvant chemotherapydistal pancreatectomypancreaticoduodenectomyResectable pancreatic cancerreviewtextbook oncological outcome

Identifiers

PMID42379736
PMCPMC13321937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.