ArticleBMJ open2026
Healthcare service user-reported quality of care in Malawi: a national multifacility cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding informal payments in the health sector in Malawi: results of a multidistrict household survey.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveImproving healthcare service user-reported quality of care is one of the three core objectives of the Malawian government's health sector strategic plan. As such, a robust understanding of service user-reported quality is crucial to inform the development of patient-centred services. This study aimed to explore how service users in Malawi evaluate the quality of the healthcare they receive across services and facilities and to investigate the association between individual and health service characteristics and reported quality of care.
designA national multifacility cross-sectional study using service user exit interview data in which all central hospitals were sampled and remaining facilities were selected via random stratified sampling. Participants were recruited via random selection based on daily patient load within sampled facilities. Descriptive statistics of service user-reported quality of care were estimated in addition to multinomial logistic regression analyses used to determine the association between patient and healthcare characteristics and perceived care quality. SETTINGS: 30 health facilities across 15 districts in Malawi.
participants4181 respondents surveyed after completing their visit and exiting healthcare facilities between January and May 2024. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall service user-reported quality of care for the facility visit as a categorical variable. This was derived from the Likert scale survey statement assessing 'overall' quality of the participant's visit, with three responses: 'very good', 'good', 'neutral-very bad'.
resultsQuality of care was reported as being high with 58% of respondents rating care as 'good' and 35% as 'very good', with some variation by 'dimension' of care (eg, treatment availability). Positive or negative perceptions of care quality were associated with age, sex, education level, illness severity, previously seeking care, referral, facility type, non-governmental facility ownership, service area, access to medication and payment of fees.
conclusionsMost healthcare service users in Malawi report receiving high-quality care, although a minority report the quality to be inadequate. Action to address gaps in service delivery, such as improving the availability of required medicines, could address the poor perceptions of quality held by the minority of interviewed service users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.