ArticleBMJ open2026
Occupational burns among migrant workers in South Korea: a qualitative study of challenges and coping strategies.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBurns are a global public health concern, and migrant workers face a disproportionately high risk for occupational burns. We traced their trajectory from injury occurrence through treatment to return to work, to identify key public health issues along this pathway. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsThis qualitative study involved repeated semi-structured interviews with seven migrant workers in South Korea who had experienced occupational burns. Participants had diverse nationalities, occupations and legal statuses. Interpreters were employed when needed. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, guided by a general inductive approach to identify recurring patterns and issues systematically.
resultsSix themes were identified and organised into three phases: pre-burns, burns-phase and post-burns challenges. Pre-burns challenges included (1) insufficient safety management and the difficulty of asserting occupational safety. Burns-phase challenges encompassed (2) worsened burn severity associated with inadequate first aid and treatment delays. Post-burns challenges involved (3) psychological trauma compounded by systemic gaps in mental health care, (4) premature return to work due to insufficient compensation, (5) inability to return to pre-injury work and limited reemployment due to lasting impairments and a passive job-seeking process, and (6) concerns about legal status.
conclusionsThe interviewed migrant workers with occupational burns face interconnected challenges rooted in systemic failures. This study highlights the need for improved workplace safety, timely medical treatment, mental health support, and adequate compensation, as well as reforms of visa renewal regulations and employer-dependent employment systems. Above all, occupational and public health policies must explicitly recognise and address the distinct vulnerabilities of migrant workers in order to protect this population and promote health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.