ArticleBone & joint open2026
Postoperative best practice for thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement : a Delphi consensus study.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement (CMCJR) is gaining popularity for the surgical management of thumb base osteoarthritis. However, there is considerable variability in the literature regarding postoperative management, with limited information on timescales for return to normal function. This study aims to develop consensus-based guidance for postoperative best practice. Methods: A three-round modified Delphi process was undertaken with 16 experienced hand surgeons and hand therapists from the UK and mainland Europe. The initial survey was developed following a comprehensive review of the literature and consultation with a patient and public involvement group. The second round was an iteration of the first, including refinement of themes into statements. The third round presented the guidance for overall agreement and comment. Consensus throughout was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Results: In round one, consensus was reached on postoperative immediate protection duration of ten to 14 days and the need for a postoperative radiograph. In round two, agreement was achieved for seven out of ten statements that included the type of immediate postoperative protection to be a bulky bandage allowing restricted thumb movement, splinting practices, thumb full range of motion commencement, and a return to driving timescale of four weeks. Return to timescales of light (two weeks), moderate (four weeks), and heavy tasks (six to eight weeks) were further defined in round three and accepted by the panellists. Conclusion: This Delphi study established consensus-based guidance for best practice in the postoperative management of thumb CMCJR, with specific inclusion of timescales for return to normal function. This will be beneficial for clinics, particularly in the UK, which are newly adopting this technique. Recommendations regarding the timing and frequency of postoperative radiographs remain to be clearly defined.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.