ArticleJMIR cardio2026
Deep Neural Networks for Automatic Atrial Fibrillation Detection Using Long-Term Ambulatory Electrocardiography: Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, affects 2% to 4% of the global adult population and is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Early diagnosis of AF and atrial flutter (AFL) is crucial due to their association with stroke risk and the challenge posed by their often asymptomatic and episodic nature. Traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation requires substantial expert input and can be challenging, especially with poor-quality ECGs. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep neural network (DNN) model in detecting AF/AFL from a large, heterogeneous set of long-term ambulatory ECG recordings, including clinical data collected over 6 months at a university hospital, and assess its effectiveness in a setting reflecting the diversity and complexity of real-world clinical data. Methods: The research combined public datasets totaling 10,248 patients, ECG data from our previous studies (648 patients), and authentic long-term ECG recordings from 4346 patients at Kuopio University Hospital for development of the DNN model. Its clinical accuracy and generalizability were assessed using a separate test dataset consisting of 1039 pseudonymized long-term ECG recordings from 1010 patients, all thoroughly reviewed and annotated by experts. Results: The DNN model demonstrated high effectiveness, achieving 96.4% sensitivity and more than 99.99% specificity for time-level AF and AFL detection. At the recording level, it identified AF and AFL with 100% sensitivity and 98.77% specificity, producing false positives in only 1.2% (11/897) of recordings, of which 81.8% (9/11) had other non-AF/AFL arrhythmias. The model maintained high performance across diverse patient characteristics, including varying ages, comorbidities, coexisting arrhythmias, and poor-quality ECG recordings. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the proposed DNN model may support automated screening for AF and AFL in long-term ambulatory ECG recordings and may reduce manual review workload in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.