Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379234›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2026

Deep Neural Networks for Automatic Atrial Fibrillation Detection Using Long-Term Ambulatory Electrocardiography: Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Jagdeep Sedha, Jukka A Lipponen, Antti Aho, Helena Jäntti, Onni E Santala, Tomi P Laitinen, Tiina M Laitinen, Jari Halonen, Mika P Tarvainen, Eemu-Samuli Seljola and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jagdeep Sedha *School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5337-8636
Jukka A Lipponen *Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1994
Antti AhoSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4383-1695
Helena JänttiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, North Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-7032
Onni E SantalaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3996-2827
Tomi P LaitinenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-9957
Tiina M LaitinenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-096X
Jari HalonenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3878-1546
Mika P TarvainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-5395
Eemu-Samuli SeljolaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-4939
Noora S NaukkarinenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-357X
Olli RantulaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-4408
Tuomas T RissanenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-2282
Juha E K HartikainenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, Kuopio, 70210, Finland, 358 443358523.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-107X
Tero J MartikainenDepartment of Prehospital Emergency Care, Acute Services, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-9845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, affects 2% to 4% of the global adult population and is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Early diagnosis of AF and atrial flutter (AFL) is crucial due to their association with stroke risk and the challenge posed by their often asymptomatic and episodic nature. Traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation requires substantial expert input and can be challenging, especially with poor-quality ECGs. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep neural network (DNN) model in detecting AF/AFL from a large, heterogeneous set of long-term ambulatory ECG recordings, including clinical data collected over 6 months at a university hospital, and assess its effectiveness in a setting reflecting the diversity and complexity of real-world clinical data. Methods: The research combined public datasets totaling 10,248 patients, ECG data from our previous studies (648 patients), and authentic long-term ECG recordings from 4346 patients at Kuopio University Hospital for development of the DNN model. Its clinical accuracy and generalizability were assessed using a separate test dataset consisting of 1039 pseudonymized long-term ECG recordings from 1010 patients, all thoroughly reviewed and annotated by experts. Results: The DNN model demonstrated high effectiveness, achieving 96.4% sensitivity and more than 99.99% specificity for time-level AF and AFL detection. At the recording level, it identified AF and AFL with 100% sensitivity and 98.77% specificity, producing false positives in only 1.2% (11/897) of recordings, of which 81.8% (9/11) had other non-AF/AFL arrhythmias. The model maintained high performance across diverse patient characteristics, including varying ages, comorbidities, coexisting arrhythmias, and poor-quality ECG recordings. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the proposed DNN model may support automated screening for AF and AFL in long-term ambulatory ECG recordings and may reduce manual review workload in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryNeural Networks, ComputerAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAIartificial intelligenceatrial fibrillationcardiac arrhythmia detectiondeep neural networksECG analysiselectrocardiogramelectrocardiogram analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42379234
PMCPMC13318395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.