Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379221›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2026

Validation of the newly introduced Deauville score 5a for patients treated for advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

Simon Leiders, Dominic Ufton, Helen Kaul, Jasmin Weindler, Johannes Rosenbrock, Michael Fuchs, Markus Dietlein, Urban Novak, Martin Fehr, Richard Greil and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00515554 phase3completednot on this map

HD18 for Advanced Stages in Hodgkins Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CologneRan2008 to 2020Enrolled1,500ConditionsHodgkins LymphomaArmsRituximab, BEACOPP escalated
NCT02661503 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

HD21 for Advanced Stages Treatment Optimization Trial in the First-line Treatment of Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma; Comparison of 6 Cycles of Escalated BEACOPP With 6 Cycles of BrECADD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CologneRan2016 to 2025Enrolled1,500ConditionsClassical Hodgkin LymphomaArmsBleomycin, Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Simon LeidersDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dominic UftonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-2434-4883
Helen KaulDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jasmin WeindlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes RosenbrockGerman Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-0556
Michael FuchsDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Markus DietleinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Urban NovakSwiss Cancer Institute Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin FehrSwiss Cancer Institute Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Richard GreilSalzburg Cancer Research Institute-Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4462-3694
Mark HertzbergDepartment of Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, and University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Josée M ZijlstraDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1074-5922
Alexander FossåDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Peter KamperNordic Lymphoma Group, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-1969
Daniel MolinNordic Lymphoma Group, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-6662-4865
Peter BorchmannDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Carsten KobeGerman Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-0826
Justin FerdinandusDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-7997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe Lugano Imaging Committee recently refined the Deauville score (DS), subdividing DS5 into DS5a (>2× liver uptake without new lesions) and DS5b (new lesions). We investigated whether this improves prognostic discrimination at interim positron emission tomography (PET) after 2 cycles (PET-2) in patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (AS-cHL) treated in recent German Hodgkin Study Group randomized phase 3 trials. The primary analysis cohort was HD18 postamendment standard arms (uniform treatment with 6 cycles of escalated doses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [eBEACOPP]); sensitivity cohorts were HD18 intention-to-treat and HD21 eBEACOPP and brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed by landmark Cox models starting at PET-2. DS5a was infrequent (4%-6% across cohorts; 39/639, 67/1745, 33/568, and 29/560). In the primary cohort, DS5 was associated with inferior PFS vs DS1 to DS3 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-7.23) and vs DS1 to DS4 (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01-5.50). Across sensitivity cohorts, DS5a remained adverse compared with DS1 to DS4 (HR range, 2.57-5.47), whereas DS4 according to the new definition did not consistently separate from DS1 to DS3, which is likely a result of PET-adapted treatment. Overall survival trends were concordant, but interpretation is limited by few events. To our knowledge, this is the first prognostic validation of the refined DS in prospectively randomized trial populations. The newly introduced DS5a isolates a small high-risk AS-cHL, which further supports risk assessment and adaptation using quantitative biomarkers from PET. The HD18 and HD21 trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00515554 and NCT02661503, respectively.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHodgkin DiseaseAdultCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyProcarbazinePrognosisCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposideProcarbazine

Identifiers

PMID42379221
PMCPMC13578970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.