ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Comparison of the clinical usefulness of CXCL-8 and conventional clinical tumor markers for gastric cancer diagnosis.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric Cancer (GC) is a prevalent disease worldwide, with substantial morbidity and mortality rates. The current clinical biomarkers, Carbohydrate Antigen-19-9 (CA19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), utilized for GC diagnosis and progression monitoring, lack optimal sensitivity and specificity. Hence, the identification of novel biomarkers for early diagnosis is crucial. The authors aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of serum C-X-C motif Chemokine-8 (CXCL-8) as a potential biomarker for GC diagnosis and progression.
methodsBetween January 1, 2023, and March 31, 2023, a total of 198 patients diagnosed with GC and 123 healthy volunteers were recruited from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Serum samples from all participants were obtained, and the levels of CXCL-8 were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, serum concentrations of CA19-9 and CEA were measured using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Clinicopathological characteristics of the GC patients were collected and analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of CXCL-8, CA19-9, and CEA for GC and Early GC (EGC) was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsThe serum levels of CXCL-8 and CEA were significantly higher in patients with GC and EGC compared to healthy volunteers; however, the CA19-9 concentrations were only significantly higher in patients with GC compared to healthy volunteers. In the GC group, Areas Under the Curves (AUCs) for CXCL-8, CEA, and CA19-9 were 0.915, 0.780, and 0.660, respectively. The combined application of CXCL-8+CEA and CXCL-8+CA19-9 yielded AUCs of 0.934 and 0.932, and was significantly higher than that of the combination of CEA+ CA19-9 (0.813). In EEC, the diagnostic performance of CXCL-8 was similar to that in the EC group. Importantly, the sensitivity of CXCL-8 was greater than that of CEA, and CA19-9 alone, and the combination of three markers (p < 0.05). Notably, serum CXCL-8 levels exhibited significant associations with the TNM stage, N-stage, vascular invasion, and nerve invasion in patients with GC.
conclusionsIn comparison to the traditional tumor markers CEA and CA19-9, the results indicate that serum CXCL-8 levels could be a promising biomarker for GC, especially in the early stages. Additionally, the results further imply the potential utility of serum CXCL-8 levels as a prognostic biomarker for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.