Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42378445›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2026

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening program.

Judith L Babar, Ian Selby, Samanjit S Hare, Aniket Tavare, Jonathan C L Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith L BabarThe HLH Imaging Group Ltd, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0BW, United Kingdom.
Ian SelbyThe HLH Imaging Group Ltd, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0BW, United Kingdom.
Samanjit S HareThe HLH Imaging Group Ltd, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0BW, United Kingdom.
Aniket TavareThe HLH Imaging Group Ltd, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0BW, United Kingdom.
Jonathan C L RodriguesThe HLH Imaging Group Ltd, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0BW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2744-3509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk individuals reduces both lung cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, supported by data from the National Lung Screening Trial, NELSON, the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP). In 2019, following a successful pilot, the UK National Health Service announced rollout of the Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) program, offering ever-smokers aged 55-74 an appointment with a health professional, which may lead to referral for LDCT based on individual risk of developing lung cancer assessed using validated multivariable risk-prediction models (PLCOm2012 and the Liverpool Lung Project model, LLPv2). As LCS expands, it is paramount that radiologists who participate in screening are adequately qualified and properly trained. To ensure the radiology reporting for an expanding program remains clinically and cost effective, reporters must engage with nationally-set quality assurance (QA) policies. In this article, we describe the approach taken by The HLH Imaging Group (HLH), a provider reporting ∼85% of LCS scans in NHS England (NHSE), to embed near real-time and routine double-read QA alongside the national external quality assurance (EQA) scheme (PERFECTS). We present aggregate referral-rate data from reporters in our network across the 2025-26 financial year and compare current NHSE fixed thresholds, with statistically-derived thresholds (mean ± 2SD; median ± k·MAD). We provide explicit rationale for our operational choices (a 2-consecutive-quarter outlier definition, 25-case retrospective review of flagged reporters, and 5% random sampling of negative reports for blinded double reading). We explicitly acknowledge that this describes a provider's approach within a wider radiological workforce; PERFECTS remains the only program-wide QA covering all NHSE LCS readers. We propose that the elements described could form the basis of an NHSE/Department of Health and Social Care standardized near real-time QA framework applicable across all LCS providers.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsQuality Assurance, Health CareTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationState MedicineUnited KingdomCT scan reportinglung cancer screeningquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID42378445
PMCPMC13623233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.