SynthesisPain2026
Efficacy and effectiveness of melatonin for the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo and active controlled trials.
Synthesis in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMelatonin may provide benefits for managing musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, and this review evaluated its efficacy and effectiveness on pain intensity and sleep quality. We searched 6 databases from inception to April 2025 and included randomized controlled trials in people with chronic or postoperative MSK pain reporting pain or sleep outcomes. Comparators included placebo or active controls (eg, analgesics). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by comparator type. Sensitivity analyses included only low-risk studies. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Twenty-three studies (2028 participants) were included. For people with chronic MSK pain, melatonin was not superior to placebo in reducing pain (mean difference [MD]: -6.76/100, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -15.89 to 2.36) but was superior to active controls (MD: -11.21/100, 95% CI: -14.29 to -8.13); in sensitivity analysis, melatonin was superior to placebo (MD: -10.04, 95% CI: -17.68 to -2.39). For people with postoperative pain, melatonin was superior to placebo, with effects similar to active controls. Sleep quality favoured melatonin in people with chronic MSK pain but not in those with postoperative pain. Adverse events were mild and transient. Melatonin may provide modest benefits for pain in people with chronic MSK pain, while evidence in postoperative pain remains limited. Although treatment effect estimates were comparable with conventional analgesics, most did not reach minimal clinically important difference thresholds and the certainty of evidence was low to moderate. Melatonin may be considered as a potential adjunct rather than a primary treatment, pending randomized controlled trials with standardised dosing and longer follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.