ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2026
Screening strategies for Chagas Disease: evaluation of a field diagnostic algorithm in Santiago del Estero
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chagas disease is one of the main endemic diseases in Latin America, affecting between 6 and 7 million people and causing approximately 12,000 deaths annually. Although antiparasitic treatment is effective in acute and chronic stages, only 10% of patients are diagnosed and only 1% receive timely treatment. In Argentina, an estimated 1.5 million people are affected by the infection, and progress has been made in reducing cases thanks to different public health interventions. Methods: In Robles, Santiago del Estero, a diagnostic algorithm was implemented using rapid tests (RT) in the field, venous extraction of positive samples and approximately 10% of negative samples, and processing using conventional serology (CS) to improve access to diagnosis in at-risk populations. Results: This algorithm enabled serological diagnosis of CD for 1,380 people between November 2021 and June 2022 in the department of Robles, confirming 48 infected individuals through SC, with an estimated loss of 4 or 5 seropositive individuals. Conclusions: The strategy proved effective, with a low patient loss rate and improved access to diagnosis, especially for women of childbearing age. Implementing PR can facilitate diagnosis in resource-limited and difficult-to-reach areas, contributing to the control of this endemic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.