ArticleJMIR aging2026
Usability and Adoption of Smartwatches by Older Adults in Bangladesh: User Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Usability and Technology Acceptance of a Wearable Monitoring System Among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wearables such as smartwatches can support point-of-care health management for older adults while reducing pressure on health care systems as aging populations grow. Although many studies emphasize technical accuracy, user-centered research on smartwatch adoption among older adults remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, such as Bangladesh. Objective: This study evaluated real-world usability, acceptance, and adoption of smartwatches among socioeconomically diverse older adults (aged ≥60 y) in a low- and middle-income country context. It examined how age, education, socioeconomic background, and cultural perceptions influence user experience, and identified barriers and facilitators related to comfort, usability, and long-term engagement. It also explored health-related features that older adults perceived as missing. Methods: Participants were recruited from older adult communities with diverse socioeconomic and educational backgrounds, and received a commercially available smartwatch. A mixed methods, 3-phase longitudinal design was conducted, including a short-term survey (n=27), 3 long-term survey data points (n=19, 18, and 18), and 2 focus group interviews (n=13 and 12). Quantitative analyses included paired t tests across longitudinal data points and chi-square tests for distributional associations, complemented by thematic qualitative analysis. Results: Comfort improved substantially over time, with participants rating the smartwatch as very comfortable, increasing from 26% (5/19) at baseline to 80% (16/20) at final follow-up. Heart rate monitoring remained the most frequently used feature, rising from 68.42% (13/19) to 75% (15/20). Paired t tests showed no significant longitudinal changes in daily usage (t5=0.00 to 0.22, P=.83 to ≥.99), comfort (t4=-0.07 to 0.30, P=.78 to .95), most liked features (t8=-0.63 to 0.51, P=.30 to .62), or clarity of instructions (t2=0.00 to 0.19, P=.87 to ≥.99). Significant increases were observed in feature usage (data point [DP] 2 vs DP3: t8=-4.16, P<.001; DP1 vs DP3: t8=-2.53, P=.03) and perceived difficulty of use (DP2 vs DP3: t8=-4.29, P<.001; DP1 vs DP3: t8=-2.31, P=.05). Chi-square analyses indicated a significant association between study phase and clarity of instructions (χ24=10.3, P=.03), with a trend for comfort (χ²8=13.8, P=.08); other usability dimensions were non-significant (χ²16=7.1 to 17.5, P=.35 to .97). Socioeconomic differences emerged in data-sharing preferences, with higher socioeconomic participants favoring continuous sharing and lower socioeconomic participants preferring emergency-only sharing. Conclusions: Older adults can adapt to wearable health technologies when given adequate time and support, regardless of education level. Preferences for a limited set of essential health features and faster adoption among participants with lower educational backgrounds highlight the need for simpler smartwatch designs. These findings can guide age-appropriate wearable technologies that prioritize usability, comfort, and familiarity to improve health care access in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.