ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Diagnostic competence and health worker knowledge of female genital schistosomiasis management in a rural Ghanaian district.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence, trend and distribution of reported cases of schistosomiasis to health facilities in the Volta Region, Ghana, 2019-2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease with a greater burden in Africa, including Ghana. Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS), a gynaecological manifestation of urogenital schistosomiasis, is often missed or misdiagnosed due to similarities with sexually transmitted infections and other gynaecological infections, with limited ease of health worker identification and diagnostic capability. This study assessed healthcare workers' knowledge and diagnostic capacity for FGS in the Central Gonja District of Ghana.
methodsA quantitative cross-sectional study sampled 237 healthcare workers from 19 facilities near the Black and the White Volta rivers using a three-phase multistage sampling process. Data was collected via a self-administered Kobo Toolbox questionnaire, focusing on sociodemographic factors, whether facilities had functional screening tools for FGS and health workers' capacity to diagnose and treat these conditions. Analysis was conducted in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), employing descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-square tests to assess inferential associations between variables and health workers' knowledge of FGS/schistosomiasis, which served as the main outcome variable.
resultsThe study involved health workers with a mean age of 31.6 ± 4.18 years, of whom 52.3% were male. Knowledge gaps were significant: only 30% (71/237) demonstrated good understanding of schistosomiasis and merely 16.9% (40/237) showed adequate knowledge of FGS. Despite 91.6% recognition of schistosomiasis ('Bilharzia'), knowledge of genital manifestations lagged severely (FGS: 26.8%, MGS (Male genital schistosomiasis): 18.1%). While demographic factors showed no association, experienced staff demonstrated better FGS knowledge (p = 0.003). Critical health system deficiencies emerged; 74% of facilities lacked laboratories, 90% lacked praziquantel and 100% lacked FGS diagnostic capacity. Even among clinicians, < 43% knew standard FGS treatment and only 1/3 considered FGS in relevant diagnoses.
conclusionIn the Central Gonja District of the savannah region located in the northern part of Ghana, where schistosomiasis prevalence is classified as moderate (10-49%), healthcare workers demonstrated limited knowledge and diagnostic capacity regarding FGS. These findings highlight the need to integrate FGS into reproductive health guidelines, strengthen healthcare worker training and improve diagnostic resources for early detection and management in endemic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.