Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42378268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluation of coupling and coordination, obstacle diagnosis, and optimization pathways of medical-preventive integration in primary healthcare institutions in Hebei Province from 2017 to 2024.

Botao Yang, Kexin Li, Zike Zhao, Zhihui Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Botao YangSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China.
Kexin LiSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China.
Zike ZhaoSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China.
Zhihui CaoSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7097-9232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical-prevention integration constitutes a core governance strategy for advancing the Healthy China initiative, with primary healthcare institutions serving as the foundational delivery platforms for its implementation. To systematically evaluate the development level, spatiotemporal evolution, and key constraining factors of medical-prevention integration at the primary level, this study takes all township health centers and community health service centers in Hebei Province as the research sample. Drawing on panel data from the Hebei Health Statistical Yearbook covering 2017-2024, an evaluation index system for the coupling and coordinated development of primary medical services and public health services was constructed and authoritatively validated using a modified Delphi method. Indicator weights were determined through the entropy method, and an integrated quantitative analytical framework was employed, incorporating the coupling coordination degree model, the relative development model, and the obstacle degree model. The results indicate that primary medical-prevention integration in Hebei Province exhibits a typical pattern of "high coupling but low coordination". Although medical and public health services have established a relatively stable institutional linkage, their overall coordinated development remains at a persistently low level, with medical services generally outperforming public health services. Township health centers demonstrate significantly higher composite development levels and coupling coordination degrees than community health service centers, forming a pronounced urban-rural dual structure in primary-level medical-prevention integration. Furthermore, substantial heterogeneity exists between the two types of institutions in terms of relative development structures and core obstacle factors. Lagging public health service capacity, along with misaligned financing and incentive mechanisms, constitutes the principal bottleneck constraining high-quality development of medical-prevention integration. By uncovering the underlying structural and institutional tensions within primary-level medical-prevention integration, this study provides robust empirical evidence and policy-relevant insights for optimizing integration strategies and advancing the construction of an integrated healthcare delivery system in Hebei Province and other comparable regions in China.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareChina

Identifiers

PMID42378268
PMCPMC13318188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.