Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42378261›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

Seen but not heard: A qualitative interview study exploring the views and experiences of children and young people referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services for support with suicidality.

Lynne Gilmour, Margaret Maxwell, Edward Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynne GilmourCentre for Healthcare and Community Research, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-5590
Margaret MaxwellCentre for Healthcare and Community Research, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Edward DuncanCentre for Healthcare and Community Research, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a leading cause of death amongst children and young people (CYP), and numbers of CYP presenting with suicidality continue to rise. CYP seeking help for suicidal thoughts and behaviours are generally referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) for assessment and treatment. However, CAMHS across the UK are unable to meet the demand for their services. Little is known about what happens to these children after they have been referred to CAMHS. Grounded in critical realism, and informed by a children's rights approach and feminist perspectives, this qualitative study sought to explore how children and young people presenting with suicidality experience the CAMHS referral process and care journey thereafter. In-depth interviews of between 60-90 minutes duration, were conducted with ten CYP aged between 13-17yrs, living in two different health board areas in Scotland, and having been referred to two different CAMHS (sites A and B). Using Charmaz constructing grounded theory approach, analysis revealed three main themes which are presented: Nothing got resolved: the care experience; "If you had more choice…" about how, when and where they worked with you; The person not the profession who helped, each built upon layers of overlapping subthemes. Further interrogation of the data, and synthesis supported the development of a substantive theory, that conceptualises children and young people presenting with suicidality as "Seen but not Heard". It is argued that CAMHS do not meet these CYP needs even when they are seen. This finding has implications for policy makers and service providers as the CYP in this study express that the support they need and find most helpful is not congruent with CAMHS. Further research is urgently required to develop and design a new service model that better meets the needs of children and young people and prioritises their views.

Identifiers

PMID42378261
PMCPMC13318000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.