ArticlePloS one2026
Progression of radial tears in L5-S1 intervertebral disc depends on location and type of movements: An in-silico study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low back pain is a global health challenge, with disc degeneration and annular tears contributing significantly to its onset and persistence. This numerical study evaluates how degeneration and the location of radial tears jointly influence the mechanical behavior of the L5-S1 spinal unit during flexion, extension, and lateral bending. A subject‑specific finite element (FE) model employing an anisotropic hyperelastic formulation was used to simulate healthy, mild, and moderate degeneration, along with radial tears spanning 75% of the annular width at four clinically relevant locations. Quantitative stress analysis revealed pronounced movement-tear location specificity, with posterior tears exhibiting approximately 4-6x higher boundary stresses during flexion, whereas anterior tears demonstrated 1.5-2x higher stresses during extension relative to other tear locations. Posterolateral (PL) tears exhibited their highest stresses during lateral bending, with PL1 (posterior‑shifted PL tear) showing 2-3x higher values and PL2 (more lateral PL tear) reaching 3-5x higher stresses compared to sagittal motions. Degeneration shifted the dominant stress contribution in PL2 from contralateral to ipsilateral lateral bending at the tear site, concurrently amplifying stress magnitudes in flexion and extension without altering the motion-dependent vulnerability patterns associated with each tear location. These findings offer biomechanical insights into how tear location and degeneration affect tear progression and may help guide clinicians in tailoring movement‑specific conservative or interventional treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.