ArticlePloS one2026
Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults with Tuberculosis (HELIA-TB) in India.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a critical public health challenge in India, where sustained patient engagement is essential for its effective management. Despite the pivotal role of health literacy, the ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply health-related information in treatment adherence and outcomes, few tools are TB specific, culturally attuned to India, and psychometrically validated. The Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA), developed in Iran, is a multidimensional, World Health Organization (WHO)-aligned measure with proven reliability and open access, making it an ideal candidate for adaptation. This study aimed to culturally adapt and validate the HELIA for use among adults receiving TB treatment in India (HELIA-TB).
methodsAn exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed for the cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the HELIA-TB in Junagadh district, Gujarat, India, between March 2024 and March 2025. The qualitative phase included expert review, forward translation, cognitive interviews with adults with TB and frontline healthcare workers, back translation, and pilot testing, following international cross-cultural validation guidelines. Findings from the qualitative phase directly informed item modification, simplification of terminology, and contextual adaptation of the HELIA-TB prior to quantitative psychometric validation. The finalized instrument was subsequently administered to 393 adults with TB to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and construct validity.
resultsHELIA-TB retained the original five domains, access, reading, understanding, appraisal, decision-making with TB specific modifications. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high (α = 0.82-0.89 across domains; 0.86 overall; ICC = 0.88), and so was content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.92). Health literacy scores were significantly associated with treatment adherence (Cohen's d = 0.89, p < 0.001) and self-rated health (Cohen's d = 0.76, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed by TB type or drug resistance status.
conclusionsThe adapted HELIA-TB demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and may support assessment of health literacy and development of targeted TB care interventions in the Indian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.