Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42378208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

In silico-predicted B-cell epitopes for bovine brucellosis serodiagnosis: Preliminary analytical evaluation of synthetic peptide- and multi-epitope protein-based indirect ELISAs.

Lucas Dos Reis de Souza, Monique Ferreira Silva Souza, Pâmela Aparecida Lima, Tatyane Martins Cirilo, Letícia Neves Ribeiro, Samuel Alexandre Pimenta Carvalho, Alessandro de Sá Guimarães, Patrícia Gomes de Souza, Paulo Martins Soares Filho, João Luís Reis Cunha and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lucas Dos Reis de SouzaDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-5348
Monique Ferreira Silva SouzaDepartamento de Patologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Pâmela Aparecida LimaDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tatyane Martins CiriloDepartamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-4284
Letícia Neves RibeiroDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Samuel Alexandre Pimenta CarvalhoDepartamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alessandro de Sá GuimarãesEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Patrícia Gomes de SouzaLaboratório Federal de Defesa Agropecuária (LFDA-MG), Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária, Pedro Leopoldo, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Paulo Martins Soares FilhoLaboratório Federal de Defesa Agropecuária (LFDA-MG), Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária, Pedro Leopoldo, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
João Luís Reis CunhaUniversity of York, York, United Kingdom.
Lilian Lacerda BuenoDepartamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tatiane Alves da PaixãoDepartamento de Patologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraDepartamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Renato Lima SantosDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4830-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological methods are valuable diagnostic tools for bovine brucellosis, a zoonotic infectious disease with a worldwide distribution. Currently employed diagnostic methods utilize crude bacterial extract or regions of LPS, a molecule that can exhibit cross-reactions with other infectious agents. The goal of this study was to develop an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAi) using synthetic peptides or a multi-epitope protein based on in silico-predicted B cell epitopes. Peptides were synthesized on a cellulose membrane using spot synthesis, and immunoblots were performed to evaluate reactivity by densitometry against bovine sera of interest. Peptides reacting with serum from positive cattle and non-reactive to the serum from negative controls were selected, synthesized in a soluble form, and used as antigens for the development of the ELISAi. Two peptides (P1 and P2) were selected and, after standardization of the ELISAi, positive (25) and negative (175) samples were tested, resulting in a sensitivity of 84% (21/25) and specificity of 83.43% (146/175). The sequence of the two peptides in replicates with spacers were inserted into a multi-epitope protein, which was also used as antigen in an ELISAi resulting in a sensitivity of 72% (18/25) and a specificity of 61.71% (108/175). This study provided a preliminary analytical assessment of in silico-predicted epitopes for developing novel serologic diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

Brucellosis, BovineEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptidesSerologic TestsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCattleComputer SimulationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoinformaticsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptides

Identifiers

PMID42378208
PMCPMC13318027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.