ArticleJCI insight2026
The molecular similarity landscape of preclinical cancer models to patient tumors.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selecting appropriate preclinical models is fundamental for translational oncology, yet a large-scale, multi-omic quantitative comparison of their similarity to primary human tumors is lacking. To address this, we integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, and genomic profiles from over 10,000 primary tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), alongside 4,000 preclinical models. Using a robust computational framework, we revealed a clear hierarchy of transcriptomic and proteomic similarity to patient tumors: with patient-dervied xenografts (PDXs) having greater transcriptomic and proteomic similarity to patient tumors (>) compared with patient-derived organoids (PDOs), which are equal in hierarchy to that of PDX-dervied organoids (PDXOs) > cell lines. We also quantified high molecular conservation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.96) across paired in vitro to in vivo platform (organoids to PDX) transitions. Furthermore, genomic analysis demonstrated that whole-exome sequencing (WES) outperforms RNA-seq in detecting DNA variants, and it identified a clonal complexity hierarchy (cell lines > PDXOs > PDXs > PDOs) reflecting the effect of passaging history on intratumor heterogeneity. Ultimately, this study delivers a comprehensive quantitative benchmark, establishing a population-level hierarchy of molecular similarity between preclinical models and primary tumors and providing a data-driven reference for model selection. These findings offer a data-driven framework for selecting models that balance biological representativeness with experimental practicality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.