Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42378002›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.

Brittany Finucci, Cassandra L Rigby, Nicholas K Dulvy, Rachel D Cavanagh, Sarah Fowler, Lucy R Harrison, Julia M Lawson, Riley Pollom, Colin A Simpfendorfer, Rachel H L Walls and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brittany FinucciIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-2946
Cassandra L RigbyIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4771-8514
Nicholas K DulvyIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-9725
Rachel D CavanaghBritish Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2474-9716
Sarah FowlerIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-7861
Lucy R HarrisonVancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Julia M LawsonBren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6404-9434
Riley PollomSingapore Oceanarium, Sentosa Island, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4614
Colin A SimpfendorferIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-2238
Rachel H L WallsEarth to Ocean Research Group, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Rima W JabadoIUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is a critical measure of global aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity status. It is also the basis for the Red List Index, which tracks extinction risk over time. Sharks, rays, and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) have now been comprehensively assessed twice (1996-2011 and 2012-2021) with hindcast assessments from 1970 onward, yielding an unprecedented extinction risk trajectory for an aquatic vertebrate class. The three-decade success of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) Shark Specialist Group (SSG) in providing updated and evidence-based assessments stems from sustained and coordinated activities by SSG members. We examined how a community of dedicated experts organized to fill gaps in key information to inform Red List assessments. From this evaluation, we identified six key lessons related to membership, taxonomic changes, implementation of the precautionary approach, information prioritization, assessment standardization, and policy efforts. However, existing challenges, including resource constraints and assessment discrepancies at different spatial scales, need to be addressed to ensure Red List assessments stay on pace with advances in conservation. With the second global assessment of chondrichthyans completed, it is appropriate to reflect on the evolution of the SSG and its achievements over three decades to highlight new tools and approaches to red listing and to identify priorities for the immediate future that are also applicable to other aquatic taxa with limited data, slow life histories, and exposure to high levels of fishing.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesElasmobranchiiEndangered SpeciesSharksSkates, FishAnimalsBiodiversityExtinction, Biologicalbiodiversity targetschondrichthyansCondrictiosconservation assessmentevaluación de la conservaciónextinction riskIUCN Red List of Threatened Speciesknowledge gapslagunas de conocimientoLista Roja de la UICN de especies amenazadasmetas de biodiversidad. medidas políticaspolicy actionriesgo de extinción保护评估《国际自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录》政策行动灭绝风险生物多样性目标知识空缺软骨鱼类

Identifiers

PMID42378002
PMCPMC13613551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.