ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Predicting Pain: Electroencephalography Signatures of Neural Integration During Experimental Tonic Thermal Pain.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain Is in the Timing: The Emerging Importance of Phase-Based EEG Connectivity.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of reliable neural signatures for pain remains a critical challenge in both clinical and experimental settings. While electroencephalography (EEG) provides a promising avenue for pain assessment, it remains unclear whether phase- or power-based neural integration drives pain-state discrimination. This study investigates functional connectivity and cross-frequency coupling (CFC) as candidate signatures of neural integration for pain prediction.
methodsWe recorded 62-channel EEG data from 36 healthy participants across experimental conditions, including tonic thermal pain, non-painful warm stimulation and resting states. Functional connectivity within the alpha band and CFC across delta, theta, alpha and low-beta bands was computed using phase- and power-based measures. Machine learning models were trained to classify pain from non-painful conditions, with prediction accuracy serving as an index of neural integration performance.
resultsPhase-based features outperformed power-based features in tonic thermal pain prediction, which indicated a dominant role for phase synchrony. The strongest topographical signatures are the connectivity involving frontal and occipital regions driven by enhanced alpha-phase connectivity or theta-alpha/delta-theta cross-frequency coupling.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that phase-based neural integration outperforms power-based integration in characterising tonic pain, and that the inclusion of amplitude information actively reduces discriminability. Phase-based measures of functional connectivity in the alpha band and cross-frequency coupling with other low-frequency oscillations may serve as candidate EEG signatures of pain, offering a data-driven framework with potential applications in research and clinical contexts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study introduces an EEG-based framework for tonic pain prediction that integrates multiple neural signatures of integration. High classification accuracy between painful and non-painful states provides new machine learning-driven insight into phase-based neural integration, reflected in functional connectivity and CFC. The findings broaden theoretical perspectives on pain processing within machine learning approaches and underscore clinically relevant potential for developing reliable, noninvasive tools to improve pain assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.