Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377977›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Predicting Pain: Electroencephalography Signatures of Neural Integration During Experimental Tonic Thermal Pain.

Yiyuan Han, Elia Valentini, Sebastian Halder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiyuan HanSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-5878
Elia ValentiniDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-6824
Sebastian HalderSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-3696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of reliable neural signatures for pain remains a critical challenge in both clinical and experimental settings. While electroencephalography (EEG) provides a promising avenue for pain assessment, it remains unclear whether phase- or power-based neural integration drives pain-state discrimination. This study investigates functional connectivity and cross-frequency coupling (CFC) as candidate signatures of neural integration for pain prediction.

methodsWe recorded 62-channel EEG data from 36 healthy participants across experimental conditions, including tonic thermal pain, non-painful warm stimulation and resting states. Functional connectivity within the alpha band and CFC across delta, theta, alpha and low-beta bands was computed using phase- and power-based measures. Machine learning models were trained to classify pain from non-painful conditions, with prediction accuracy serving as an index of neural integration performance.

resultsPhase-based features outperformed power-based features in tonic thermal pain prediction, which indicated a dominant role for phase synchrony. The strongest topographical signatures are the connectivity involving frontal and occipital regions driven by enhanced alpha-phase connectivity or theta-alpha/delta-theta cross-frequency coupling.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that phase-based neural integration outperforms power-based integration in characterising tonic pain, and that the inclusion of amplitude information actively reduces discriminability. Phase-based measures of functional connectivity in the alpha band and cross-frequency coupling with other low-frequency oscillations may serve as candidate EEG signatures of pain, offering a data-driven framework with potential applications in research and clinical contexts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study introduces an EEG-based framework for tonic pain prediction that integrates multiple neural signatures of integration. High classification accuracy between painful and non-painful states provides new machine learning-driven insight into phase-based neural integration, reflected in functional connectivity and CFC. The findings broaden theoretical perspectives on pain processing within machine learning approaches and underscore clinically relevant potential for developing reliable, noninvasive tools to improve pain assessment.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyPainAdultFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMachine LearningMalePain MeasurementPredictive Learning ModelsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42377977
PMCPMC13317760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.