Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377959›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Barriers to Nutrition Security in the US.

Caroline E Owens, Ronit Ridberg, Julia Reedy Sharib, Hope C Craig, Dariush Mozaffarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline E OwensFood Is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ronit RidbergFood Is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julia Reedy SharibFood Is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hope C CraigFood Is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dariush MozaffarianFood Is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Cost-Effectiveness of Health System and State-Level Strategies to Improve Diet and Reduce Cardiometabolic DiseasesR01HL115189 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI DARIUSH MOZAFFARIAN · 2013 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nutrition security is increasingly recognized as a critical but underexamined driver of health. Identifying barriers to nutrition security is essential for developing effective interventions. Objective: To examine associations among barriers to healthy eating, their prevalence by sociodemographics, and their associations with health conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, a population-based survey was conducted between February and April 2023 among English-speaking US adults aged 18 years or older recruited and surveyed through the Qualtrics panel service, with oversampling among people with annual household incomes less than $50 000. Data were analyzed from March 18 to November 9, 2025. Exposures: Nutrition security status and barriers to nutrition security, assessed through the Nutrition Security Screener. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were health conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, heart disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, stroke, and cancer. Independent variables were nutrition security barriers. Covariates included age, gender, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, annual household income, and food security status. Multivariable regressions with health condition outcomes were stratified by nutrition security status. Results: Of 3009 survey respondents, 3000 provided information on barriers to nutrition security and were included in analyses (1518 [50.6%] were female; 1983 [66.1%] were between ages 18 and 49 years). A mean (SD) of 7.8 (3.0) barriers were reported among participants with nutrition insecurity compared with 4.4 (3.2) among those who had nutrition security. Most barriers were only modestly intercorrelated (mean [SD] r = 0.45 [0.13]), with the highest correlation (r = 0.86) between insufficient time to shop and to cook. Barriers clustered into 2 factors that explained 61.4% of the variance. Black adults had higher odds of transportation barriers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.17-2.08]) than White adults, whereas Hispanic/Latinx adults had higher odds of nutrition assistance barriers (AOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.26-2.17]) than those who were non-Hispanic/Latinx. A higher number of barriers (per unit increase [range, 0-13]) was associated with higher prevalence of diabetes (AOR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04-1.16]), heart disease (AOR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]), and obesity (AOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]) among adults with nutrition security and of heart disease (AOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.03-1.22]) and stroke (AOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.25]) among those with nutrition insecurity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study among US adults, barriers to nutrition security were interrelated, varied across demographics, and were associated with disease conditions. These findings provide new insights into how barriers to healthy eating can be assessed, informing more targeted clinical, public health, and policy initiatives.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFood SecurityAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42377959
PMCPMC13320644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.