ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2026
Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled and Resistant Hypertension in Italy.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has achieved meaningful clinical benefit as an adjunct treatment for uncontrolled and resistant hypertension.
aimThis analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of RF RDN in Italy.
methodsA previously published and validated Markov model was adapted to project strategy-specific costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and clinical events over a lifetime horizon for RF RDN and standard of care (SOC) cohorts. The model consisted of seven primary health states, with state transitions informed by multivariate risk equations. Italian costs, utilities, and survival data informed key model inputs. Clinical data from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (- 4.9 mmHg reduction in office systolic blood pressure vs. sham), with alternative effect sizes explored in sensitivity analyses. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated against a threshold of €25,000 per QALY gained. The ten-year budget impact was evaluated.
resultsOver ten years, RF RDN was associated with meaningful reductions in relative risk for: myocardial infarction (0.88), stroke (0.80), and heart failure (0.72). Over lifetime, RF RDN added €3,418 in costs and 0.41 QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €8282 per QALY gained. RF RDN was cost-effective across all scenarios explored. At ten years, RF RDN uptake among resistant hypertension patients was associated with per-patient cost savings of - €4302 (€8526 RF RDN vs. €12,829 SOC) from avoided clinical events.
conclusionRF RDN was cost-effective over a lifetime horizon, with the associated increase in ten-year budget impact justified by corresponding reductions in clinical events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.