ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Perspectives on allergic rhinitis and related upper airway conditions: a qualitative meta-synthesis of patient and healthcare professional experiences.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) and related upper airway conditions impose a substantial burden on quality of life and daily functioning. Although biomedical research predominates, the subjective experiences of patients and healthcare professionals remain underexplored.
methodsThe aim of this review was to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences, perceptions, and management strategies of individuals with allergic rhinitis and related upper airway conditions, as well as the perspectives of healthcare professionals involved in their care. A thematic meta-synthesis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (XXX). Comprehensive searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, Complementary Index, OAIster, and Web of Science up to August 2025. Study selection followed the PICo framework, and methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (QARI). Data were analyzed using Thomas and Harden's three-stage thematic synthesis approach.
resultsEleven qualitative studies with 271 participants (235 patients, 36 professionals) from multiple countries were included. Three major themes and seven subthemes were identified: (1) Making Sense of Illness (identity, symptom burden, emotional responses), (2) Treatment and Management Strategies (personal and pharmacological approaches, alternative and professional orientations), and (3) Care Journey and Meaning-Making (diagnostic uncertainty, information networks). AR was found to be a multidimensional experience shaped not only by symptoms but also by stigma, social perceptions, and healthcare interactions.
conclusionEffective management of allergic rhinitis and related upper airway conditions requires more than pharmacological interventions, emphasizing patient-centered communication, shared decision-making, and individualized care. Incorporating digital self-management tools and culturally sensitive approaches may improve adherence and outcomes. Future research should explore cross-cultural perspectives, long-term patient experiences, and the integration of digital health technologies into care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.