ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Reframing Substance Misuse Prevention: a RE-AIM Analysis of Federal Infrastructure and Future Directions.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substance misuse prevention is a significant component of public health policy in the USA. Currently, federal prevention efforts rely primarily on a coalition-based framework supported through four mechanisms: (1) the Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Block Grant, (2) the Drug-Free Communities Program, (3) the Partnerships for Success initiative, and (4) Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this article critically analyzes the performance of this system and considers scalable alternatives. Findings indicate that while coalitions mobilize local stakeholders, the model is resource-intensive, inconsistently implemented, and limited in its capacity to achieve sustained, population-level impact. Proposed alternatives include integrating prevention science into professional education, mandating EBPP delivery in universal settings such as schools, embedding routine screening and early intervention, creating a national repository of free prevention programs, and expanding the use of digital applications and wearable technologies. Implications include restructuring federal funding priorities, embedding prevention within existing infrastructures, and advancing research on cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.