Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377804›Full record

ReviewBehavior research methods2026

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Yixiao Dong, Deodatta Baral, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yixiao DongDepartment of Education, Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9490, USA. ydong@ucsb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-952X
Deodatta BaralUniversity of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Kushmakar BaralUniversity of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Denis DumasUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some are neutral, many psychological constructs (e.g., depression, learning motivation, or antisocial behavior) carry clear directional expectations that align with social or ethical principles and values. When a construct is framed with the goal of moving toward its socially desirable direction, it becomes a meaningful psychological objective to pursue. People pursue different objectives in their daily lives, sometimes simultaneously. During this process, tradeoffs occur when objectives are in tension or conflict (e.g., speed and accuracy in problem-solving), meaning they cannot be consistently improved without compromising one another. While certain psychological tradeoffs have been well studied, others remain underexplored or possibly even unidentified. One critical reason is that mainstream analytic methods used in psychological research are not designed to investigate such tradeoffs. Fortunately, a suitable method has long existed in other disciplines. Pareto optimization (PO) is an effective analytic framework widely applied in fields such as biology, economics, and engineering to investigate tradeoffs among multiple competing objectives. In this tutorial, we review the core conceptual and methodological foundations of PO and aim to bring this classic method to a psychological audience. Moreover, we develop a user-friendly R Shiny application (named PO-Run) for conducting PO analyses and adapt the Marginal Rate of Substitution Index from econometrics to quantify psychological tradeoffs. The application can be accessed via https://paretooptimization.shinyapps.io/Pareto/ , and its utility is further illustrated through a real-world psychological example. Methodological considerations, guidance for using results, and future directions for advancing the PO method are discussed.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsModels, PsychologicalHumansMulti-objectiveOptimizationPareto frontierR Shiny appTradeoffs

Identifiers

PMID42377804
PMCPMC13319189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.