ReviewUpdates in surgery2026
Impact of training with a 3-dimensional printed cystic duct malformation model on laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cystic duct malformation can increase the complexity and risk of adverse events in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this study was to detemine the benefits of training with a three-dimensional (3D) printed model of cystic duct malformation for trainees. From January 2019 to January 2024, 14 trainees were divided into two groups, the 3D training group (n = 6) and the No-3D training group (n = 6), based on whether they used a 3D-printed model for training. After the training was completed, data on LCs performed by the 12 trainees were compared to the two groups. The 3D training group completed 315 LCs within 6 months, while the No-3D training group completed 375 LCs. There were no significant differences in gender, age, or surgical experience between the two groups. In comparison to the No-3D training group, the 3D training group had a shorter operation time (35.6 ± 18.5 min vs. 39.7 ± 20.8 min, P = 0.007), a higher rate of recognizing cystic duct malformations (32/36, 88.9% vs. 29/48, 60.4%, P = 0.004), a lower rate of surgeon changes (7.3% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.023), and a lower incidence of total adverse events (11.1% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.041). Training with a 3D printed model of cystic duct malformation for junior surgeons can reduce the operation time, enhance identification of cystic duct malformations, enable trainees to complete operation independently, decrease adverse events, and improve safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.