Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377688›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Involuntary Celibacy in the Digital Age: a Critical Narrative Review of the Incel Phenomenon, Mental Health Burden, Ideological Pathways, and Public Health Implications.

Jaypee S Yongco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jaypee S YongcoOffice of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Enterprise, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines. jaypee.yongco@g.msuiit.edu.ph.ORCID 0000-0002-7843-3792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewInvoluntary celibacy, as expressed in the contemporary online incel community, has evolved from a marginal sexual condition first studied in the late 1990s to a male-dominated digital subculture that intersects with mental health, gender-based violence, and democratic security agendas. RECENT

findingsThis critical narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed empirical and conceptual literature published primarily between 2020 and 2026 on the demographics, psychological profile, ideological architecture, online radicalization pathways, violence risk, and public health implications of the incel phenomenon. Self-identified incels show severe mental health burdens, including elevated depression, anxiety, loneliness, suicidal ideation, autism spectrum traits, and disengagement from education and employment. The "black pill" worldview that organizes much of incel discourse is based on biological determinism, lookism, and hypergamy claims, producing hopelessness and displaced rage. Pathway analyses indicate that mental health distress and ideological adherence each predict harmful attitudes more strongly than online networking, with both factors operating bidirectionally. The empirical relationship between incel ideology and outward-directed violence is contested, while the connection to self-directed violence is well supported. An adequate response to the incel phenomenon refuses both pure securitization and pure pathologization, integrating clinical engagement, education policy, platform governance, gender justice frameworks, and suicide prevention. Cross-cultural research, particularly in Southeast Asian and other Global South contexts, remains a research priority of the highest order.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthPublic HealthViolenceDigital MediaHumansAggrieved entitlementBlack pillGender-based violenceHegemonic masculinityIncelsInvoluntary celibacyManosphereMental healthOnline radicalizationSuicide prevention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.