ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Opioid use disorder and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasingly encountered among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), yet its impact on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 5,875 patients undergoing PCI for ACS between 2012 and 2019. Patients were stratified by documented OUD identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year Outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and time-to-event analyses. Compared with non-OUD patients, those with OUD were more likely to be African American, active smokers, and to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but had lower rates of diabetes. After adjustment, OUD was associated with significantly higher odds of LifeVest prescription during the index hospitalization (adjusted OR 9.94, 95% CI 3.13-31.55). At 30 days, OUD was independently associated with higher risks of any-lesion coronary reintervention (adjusted OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.49-5.66) and same-lesion reintervention (adjusted OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.93-11.77). At 1 year, OUD showed a trend toward higher congestive heart failure readmission (adjusted OR 3.05, 95% CI 0.91-10.28), without significant associations with recurrent ACS or all-cause mortality. Among patients undergoing PCI for ACS, OUD is associated with increased early coronary reintervention and greater likelihood of LifeVest prescription, without increased mortality. These findings highlight a vulnerable population that may benefit from enhanced post-PCI monitoring and multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.