ArticleHealth economics review2026
Beyond spending: nonlinear impacts of health financing and out-of-pocket costs on mortality in Africa.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExisting evidence suggests that mortality remains disproportionately high across Africa, where gains in life expectancy continue to lag behind global progress. While health financing is central to health-system performance, its relationship with mortality in African settings remains insufficiently characterized, particularly when public spending, household out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, governance conditions, and demographic pressures are considered jointly. Our objective was to use a non-linear regression method to evaluate how health financing structures are associated with mortality and whether the association depends on the mode of financing.
methodsWe use generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to allow for potential non-linear relationships between crude mortality rates and public health expenditure, out-of-pocket payments, political stability, and age dependency across 51 African countries from 2002 to 2022 (N = 1,071 country-year observations). A tensor-product interaction assessed whether financial protection modifies the effect of public health spending. Region-specific models were fitted for Central, East, West, Southern, and Northern Africa.
resultsPublic health spending was associated with lower mortality across Africa, with the steepest reductions below approximately US$80 per capita and diminishing returns thereafter. Out-of-pocket (OOP) spending modified these returns: OOP burdens below 15% of total health expenditure strengthened the estimated mortality benefit of public investment by about 60%, whereas burdens above 40% substantially eroded it. Regionally, the spending-mortality association was strongest in Central, Eastern, and Western Africa, but weaker in Southern and Northern Africa, where age dependency and governance quality were more prominent predictors. The expenditure-OOP interaction was most pronounced in Eastern Africa (EDF = 9.45, F = 4.45, p < 0.001). The continent-wide model showed strong explanatory performance (adjusted R
conclusionsIncreasing public health spending alone is unlikely to maximize mortality gains in Africa. Its impact depends on financial protection: reducing household out-of-pocket costs through pooled financing should be accompanied by expanded public investment. In Southern and Northern Africa, policy emphasis should also shift toward governance efficiency and demographic pressures. Subregion-specific strategies are therefore essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.