ArticleCEN case reports2026
Denosumab increased bone mineral density but caused marked serum calcium fluctuations in a patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis.
Article in CEN case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Denosumab is increasingly used to treat osteoporosis in patients with advanced kidney disease, but clinically significant disturbances in calcium homeostasis remain a major concern. We report a peritoneal dialysis (PD) case in which denosumab administration was followed by pronounced calcium fluctuations requiring medication management. A 56-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease due to lupus nephritis, receiving prednisolone (5 mg/day), had been on continuous ambulatory PD (1.5-L exchanges three times daily) for 5 years. Baseline intact parathyroid hormone was 176 pg/mL. Osteoporosis was confirmed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (lumbar spine 68% and femoral neck 58% of the young adult mean [YAM]). Denosumab 60 mg was administered, and BMD increased within 10 months to 78% YAM at the lumbar spine and 77% YAM at the femoral neck (same facility, identical DXA equipment). To mitigate hypocalcemia, dialysate calcium was pre-emptively increased to two 3.5-mEq/L and one 2.5-mEq/L bags per day (albumin-corrected calcium 9.5 mg/dL at dosing). Nonetheless, symptomatic hypocalcemia developed (nadir 7.8 mg/dL on day 7), prompting escalation to three 3.5-mEq/L bags with intensified vitamin D therapy and calcium supplementation. Serum calcium then overshot, peaking at 13.8 mg/dL on day 29; therapy was de-escalated and calcium stabilized. This case highlights that while daily dialysate calcium exposure in PD may buffer early hypocalcemia, concurrent escalation of dialysate calcium, vitamin D therapy, and calcium supplementation can precipitate overshoot hypercalcemia. Frequent monitoring and staged, stepwise prescription changes during the first month after denosumab are essential. Standardized PD-specific post-denosumab calcium management protocols are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.