Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Knowledge of cancer genetics and attitudes about genetic counseling and testing: a randomized trial of the Know Your Risk intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling.
Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05325151 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine if the developed Know Your Risk (KYR) intervention is similar to conventional genetic counseling; we evaluated participants' knowledge of cancer genetics, breast cancer risk perception, attitudes about genetic counseling and testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling.
methodsWomen (n = 866) who screened at elevated risk for breast cancer were randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling (2022-2024). The KYR intervention included a series of online pre-test educational videos, direct access to genetic testing, and patient preference for receiving post-test genetic counseling. Participants completed surveys at baseline and after genetic counseling and testing. Non-inferiority hypothesis testing compared the two participant groups.
resultsThe mean knowledge score (range 0-12) increased in both study groups from a baseline mean of 6.87 (standard deviation (SD) = 2.46) to 8.66 (SD = 2.16) for the KYR intervention and 8.56 (SD = 2.14) for conventional counseling. Additionally, statistical analyses suggest the non-inferiority of the KYR intervention for participants' accuracy of their breast cancer risk, attitudes about genetic counseling and genetic testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling compared to participants randomized to conventional genetic counseling.
conclusionFindings support that the components included in the KYR intervention are non-inferior for cancer genetic knowledge, risk perception, genetic counseling and testing attitudes, and genetic counseling satisfaction among women who screen at elevated risk for breast cancer. By using the combination of components included in the KYR intervention, genetic counseling and genetic testing are more accessible, convenient, and patient-driven.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05325151.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.