Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377601›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Abdominal symmetry index after reconstruction of traumatic lumbar hernia with dual polypropylene mesh: a comparative CT-based study.

Jocielle Santos de Miranda, Patrícia Perola Dantas, Marcia Kiyomi Koike, Manoel de Souza Rocha, Mario Paulo Faro, Abel Hiroshi Fernandes Murakami, Allan Antonelli Meira, Edna Frasson de Souza Montero, Claudio Augusto Vianna Birolini, Sergio Henrique Bastos Damous and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jocielle Santos de MirandaDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. jocielle.miranda@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-3975
Patrícia Perola DantasDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8083-6582
Marcia Kiyomi KoikeLaboratório de Emergências Clínicas (LIM-51), Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-8061
Manoel de Souza RochaDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-8374
Mario Paulo FaroDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-948X
Abel Hiroshi Fernandes MurakamiDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-6225
Allan Antonelli MeiraDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8111-5701
Edna Frasson de Souza MonteroDepartment of Surgery, Laboratório de Investigação Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1437-1219
Claudio Augusto Vianna BiroliniDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-9251
Sergio Henrique Bastos DamousDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-225X
Edivaldo Massazo UtiyamaDivision of Surgical Clinic III, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8453-7184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraumatic lumbar hernia (TLH) is a rare and challenging abdominal wall defect. In these patients, treatment success is usually assessed by recurrence, although persistent postoperative bulging or asymmetry may remain clinically relevant even without true failure of repair. This study evaluated the abdominal symmetry index (ASI), defined as a CT-based side-to-side ratio of lateral abdominal wall distance, as an objective morphologic parameter after TLH reconstruction with dual polypropylene mesh.

methodsA single-center retrospective comparative study was performed at a tertiary academic referral center from 2006 to 2025. The study included 25 consecutive eligible patients with TLH who underwent elective open abdominal wall reconstruction with dual polypropylene mesh and 25 controls without abdominal wall disease. In the TLH group, ASI was assessed on CT before and after surgery; controls underwent a single CT-based assessment. The operative repair consisted of deep preperitoneal/retroperitoneal reinforcement whenever feasible, muscle reapproximation when possible, and preaponeurotic/onlay reinforcement.

resultsSex distribution did not differ significantly between groups. Mean age was 42 +/- 13 years in the hernia group and 37 +/- 13 years in controls, while mean body mass index was 31 +/- 4 and 28 +/- 5 kg/m2, respectively (p = 0.023). Hernia volume was estimated using the ellipsoid formula and had a median value of 443 cm3 (range, 244-1013 cm3). Clinical follow-up was 62 +/- 47 months, and the interval between surgical repair and the latest postoperative CT scan was 687.3 +/- 712.6 days. No recurrence was observed. Before surgery, the measurement on the hernia side was significantly greater than on the contralateral side (185 +/- 24 mm vs. 144 +/- 12 mm; p < 0.0001). After reconstruction, this difference was no longer statistically significant (154 +/- 15 mm vs. 149 +/- 13 mm; p = 0.1022). Mean ASI was 1.29 +/- 0.18 preoperatively, 1.03 +/- 0.07 postoperatively, and 0.99 +/- 0.03 in controls (overall p < 0.0001). Holm-Sidak adjusted pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between preoperative TLH and controls (p = 1.14 × 10^-13) and between preoperative and postoperative TLH (p = 1.64 × 10^-11), whereas postoperative TLH did not differ significantly from controls (p = 0.2142).

conclusionASI was feasible as an exploratory CT-based morphologic index for postoperative evaluation of TLH repair. Reconstruction with dual polypropylene mesh was associated with substantial improvement in abdominal wall symmetry, with postoperative values approaching those of controls. Further validation, including interobserver reproducibility and correlation with patient-reported outcomes, is required before broader adoption.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, AbdominalHerniorrhaphySurgical MeshAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPolypropylenesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedPolypropylenesAbdominal symmetryAbdominal wall reconstructionComputed tomographyLateral abdominal wallSurgical meshTraumatic lumbar hernia

Identifiers

PMID42377601
PMCPMC13319866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.