Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377597›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Emerging molecular targets in gynaecologic cancers: clinical implications for personalized therapy.

Babulla Shaik, Mounika Thokala, Firdosh Shaik, Sravani Nakka, Osman Basha Pinjari, Ruben Babu Marabathula, Ammar Al-Farga, Muni Kumari Anday

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Babulla ShaikDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Mounika ThokalaDepartment of Biotechnology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Firdosh ShaikDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Sravani NakkaDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Osman Basha PinjariDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Ruben Babu MarabathulaDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India.
Ammar Al-FargaDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. amalfarga@ibbuniv.edu.ye.
Muni Kumari AndayDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, India. munikumari29@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynaecologic malignancies, such as ovarian, cervical, endometrial, vulvar, and vaginal cancers, are a significant health burden in the world, characterised by significant heterogeneity in their mode of expression on the molecular scale, high rates of recurrence, and low rates of sustained response to standard treatment. Recent progress in cancer genomics has essentially redefined the nature of these diseases, discovering multifaceted genetic, epigenetic, and tumour microenvironment-based processes that regulate tumour progression, therapeutic response, and resistance. This review summarises the existing knowledge about the molecular pathogenesis of gynaecologic cancers, including the essential oncogenic pathways, such as PI3K/AKT /mTOR pathways, malfunctioning DNA damage repair, angiogenesis, hormone receptors, and tumour immune interactions. Efforts are also analysed in areas of clinical integration of biomarker-driven targeted therapies, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and emerging antibody drug conjugates, highlighting the areas of progress and current shortcomings. Primary and acquired resistance mechanisms, such as tumour microenvironment-mediated adaptations, are also critically considered together with new approaches to overcome therapeutic resistance using rational combination and treatment sequencing. We also see how the role of molecular biomarkers, companion diagnostics, genomic profiling, and liquid biopsy technologies is growing in allowing precision oncology, but ethical, economic, and access-associated limitations limit equitable application. All this review indicates the redefinition of gynaecologic cancer therapy by molecularly informed therapeutic approaches and a translational roadmap towards sustainably achieved biomarker-driven clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleMolecular Targeted TherapyPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorGenomic profilingGynaecologic cancers: Precision medicineMolecular biomarkersTargeted therapyTherapeutic resistanceTumour heterogeneity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.