ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Development and Internal Validation of a Vectorcardiography-Augmented Model for 12-Month Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and internally validate a vectorcardiography (VCG)-augmented model for estimating 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with CHF between 31 May 2023 and 31 May 2024, with data lock on 31 May 2025. The prespecified endpoint was any MACE within 12 months after the index hospitalization. ECG-to-VCG transformation was performed using the Kors method. The prespecified primary six-predictor model included LVEDD, NYHA class, frontal, horizontal, and sagittal QRS-T angles, and the QRS-loop reversal/U-turn sign. BNP and LVEF were evaluated in full-model, comparator-model, and incremental-value analyses. Because the prediction target was fixed 12-month risk rather than time-to-event hazard, multivariable logistic regression was used as the primary modelling approach. Internal validation was performed using 1000 bootstrap resamples, with apparent, optimism-corrected, calibration, and shrinkage-adjusted performance reported. Of 201 screened, 160 were included; MACE occurred in 68/160 (42.5%). The six-predictor model showed an apparent AUC of 0.946 (95% CI 0.914-0.978). Bootstrap internal validation yielded an AUC optimism estimate of 0.012 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.934. The apparent Brier score was 0.091, the apparent calibration slope was 1.000, and the apparent calibration intercept was 0.000. After bootstrap correction, the Brier score was 0.106, calibration-in-the-large was - 0.009, calibration intercept was - 0.010, calibration slope was 0.852, and the applied uniform shrinkage factor was 0.852. In formal incremental analyses, adding VCG features to a conventional base model improved AUC from 0.890 to 0.955 (ΔAUC 0.065; DeLong P = 0.001), with a lower Brier score and favourable discrimination/reclassification indices. A VCG-augmented model incorporating LVEDD, NYHA class, spatial QRS-T angles, and the QRS-loop reversal/U-turn sign showed promising internally validated performance for estimating 12-month MACE risk in hospitalized patients with CHF. External multicentre validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.