ArticleMicrobial ecology2026
Comparing Aquatic Environmental DNA, Microscopy and Sedimentary DNA to Investigate Cyanobacterial Community Dynamics Across a Trophic Gradient.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a result of increasing temperatures and anthropogenic stressors, freshwater biomonitoring indicates that toxigenic and non-native cyanobacterial species are increasing globally. Because of the high-effort nature of traditional microscopy, aquatic Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding as a form of biomonitoring is becoming commonplace. While eDNA has been found to complement microscopic phytoplankton analysis, it has also been demonstrated that recent eDNA from surficial sediments (sedDNA) can also be a powerful tool to monitor a variety of organisms including benthic and planktonic microorganisms. However, comparisons between all three methods are rare. Therefore, we compared cyanobacterial metabarcoding data derived from aquatic eDNA and sedDNA to cell density and biomass determined by traditional planktonic microscopic analysis on samples taken from more than 20 lakes in the Masurian and Suwałki Lakelands of north-east Poland; an area composed of thousands of lakes with diverse morphologies, land-use histories, and varying trophic states. We found that there was a high degree of within method (eDNA/sedDNA, cell density/biomass) correspondence between the approaches, with trophic changes plausibly driving general patterns in taxa leading to these underlying agreements. Between methods, cell density proved to be more closely associated with eDNA, but was not found to be statistically significant. We postulate that cell numbers are a more similar metric to sequence read numbers than biomass, but that unique qualities of each measure mean that the approaches examined are complementary, rather than redundant. We detected several invasive taxa, which appear to have increased in abundance along the trophic gradients, and postulate that the accumulating nature of sediments may prove useful in detecting invasive taxa, particularly in the low-abundance early introductory stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.