ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Fluoroscopic quantification of early in vivo expansion of VIATORR controlled expansion stent-grafts after TIPS: hemodynamic and clinical implications.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe VIATORR Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent-graft was developed to allow more precise control of shunt diameter during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. However, real-world data on its actual in vivo expansion behavior and short-term clinical implications remain limited. This study aimed to provide fluoroscopic quantitative assessment of early in vivo expansion of VCX stent-grafts and to assess its association with short-term overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE).
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort included consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS using either a legacy 8-mm VIATORR TIPS stent-graft (VTS) or a VCX stent-graft. In the VCX group, stents were initially dilated to 8 mm and further dilated to 10 mm only when post-procedural portal pressure gradient (PPG) remained > 12 mmHg or decreased by < 50% from baseline. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare short-term clinical outcomes between the VCX and VTS groups. The primary imaging outcome was early in vivo expansion of the VCX controlled mid-segment, assessed by fluoroscopic diameter measurements at implantation and 3-month follow-up. The main clinical safety outcome was new-onset OHE within 6 months after TIPS.
resultsA total of 177 patients were included (108 VTS and 69 VCX). Among VCX patients with paired imaging follow-up, the mid-segment diameter increased from 8.0 mm at implantation to a mean of 8.65 mm at 3 months (range 8.2-9.1 mm; p < 0.001). Mean post-TIPS PPG increased from 7.7 mmHg immediately after TIPS to 11.6 mmHg at 3 months (p < 0.001), with no significant correlation between diameter change and PPG change. After PSM, 132 patients were analyzed. The cumulative 6-month incidence of OHE was numerically higher in the VCX group but did not reach statistical significance compared with VTS (HR 11.74, 95% CI 0.73-4.16; log-rank p = 0.204).
conclusionsVCX stent-grafts exhibit measurable early self-expansion after implantation, indicating that the controlled-expansion segment may not remain fixed at the intended 8-mm diameter during early follow-up. While the incidence of OHE did not differ significantly between the VCX group and the VTS group after PSM, the observed expansion underscores the dynamic nature of post-TIPS stent behavior and supports imaging-based follow-up of shunt configuration and hemodynamic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.