SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
Endoscopic negative-pressure therapy for anastomotic leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUGI anastomotic leaks are severe postoperative complications associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalization. EVT is a minimally invasive alternative to conventional approaches, but evidence has not been comprehensively synthesized.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Observational studies (January 2015-January 2025) identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS. Adults with UGI anastomotic leaks treated with EVT were eligible. Random-effects models pooled proportions using the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation; sensitivity analyses used a logit transformation. Pre-specified subgroup analyses stratified by surgical indication (oncologic, bariatric, mixed), leak location (intrathoracic vs intra-abdominal), and risk of bias. Risk of bias was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case series and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
resultsThirty-one studies (n = 767) were included. The pooled clinical success was 87% (95% CI, 82-91%) and remained high in sensitivity analyses (84-89%). No material differences were observed across oncologic, bariatric, or mixed series. Intrathoracic leaks showed lower success than intra-abdominal leaks (79 vs 95%). Thirty-day mortality was 7%, primarily in complex clinical contexts. Heterogeneity was substantial, and small-study effects were suspected. Overall certainty of evidence was rated low owing to observational design and risk of bias.
conclusionsAcross observational studies, EVT achieved high clinical success for UGI anastomotic leaks with low short-term mortality. Prospective cohorts and randomized trials are needed to refine indications, identify predictors of response, and assess cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.