ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Comparative analysis of bias and quality in YouTube videos on bariatric surgery and weight-loss medications.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWeight-loss surgery (WLS) remains the most effective treatment for clinically severe obesity, while weight-loss medications (WLM), particularly GLP-1 agonists, have recently gained widespread public attention. With YouTube serving as a major source of health information, the quality and tone of videos discussing these interventions warrant evaluation. This study compares the source, content quality, and perceived tone of YouTube videos related to WLS and WLM.
methodsUsing an incognito browser, the first 200 "most relevant" YouTube videos for the search terms "weight loss surgery" and "weight loss medicine" were screened in October 2023. Eligible videos were categorized by source and content type. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, and tone was classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Two independent reviewers scored all videos, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for comparisons, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 129 WLS and 111 WLM videos were analyzed. WLM videos demonstrated significantly higher view ratios (p < 0.0001) and more comments (p = 0.0014). WLM videos were predominantly commercial (76%) and informational (97%). Mean DISCERN scores were higher for WLM videos (46.69 ± 8.75; fair) compared with WLS videos (40.32 ± 8.70; poor; p = 0.0366). In contrast, WLS videos more frequently originated from academic centers (50%) and included patient experience content (49%). Tone differed significantly between groups (p < 0.01): 60% of WLS videos were positive, whereas WLM videos exhibited fewer positive (44%) and more negative tones (14%).
conclusionsWLM videos were of higher informational quality but conveyed a less positive overall tone, whereas WLS videos presented more positively but were of lower quality. These findings highlight substantial variation in publicly accessible YouTube content on weight-loss interventions and underscore the need for improved, high-quality patient education materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.