SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis according to symptom onset and patient admission: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains its gold standard treatment. However, the optimal timing of LC, whether early during the index admission or delayed after conservative management, remains debated. Variability in defining "early" surgery, whether based on symptom onset or hospital admission, further complicates the interpretation of existing evidence.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251081587). Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC; index admission) with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC; ≥ 4 weeks after conservative management) in adults with AC were included. Primary outcomes were conversion to open surgery, intraoperative complications, common bile duct (CBD) injury and operative time. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, wound infections, bile leaks, intra-abdominal collections, retained CBD stones, total length of hospital stay, postoperative length of hospital stay, and mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed according to definitions of early surgery (≤ 72 h from symptom onset or ≤ 72 h from hospital admission).
resultsTwenty-one RCTs comprising 1731 patients were analysed. ELC significantly reduced total hospital stay (mean difference = - 3.50 days, 95% CI - 4.11 to - 2.90; P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in conversion to open surgery, CBD injury, operative time, or overall postoperative complications. ELC was associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative complications (RR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.31-3.39; P = 0.002); however, these were predominantly minor technical events and did not translate into increased postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent safety irrespective of timing definitions.
conclusionsEarly laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces hospital stay without increasing major morbidity or bile duct injury. Defining early surgery relative to hospital admission appears clinically practical and safe, supporting early intervention as the preferred strategy in appropriately resourced settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.