ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Robotic-assisted fetal myelomeningocele repair: feasibility and technique refinement using a surgical simulation model.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore and refine a robotic-assisted fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair technique using a simulation-based platform to assess feasibility, optimize surgical strategies, and enhance training.
methodsA fetal simulation model was developed to support robotic practice in a fluid environment mimicking intrauterine conditions. The model included a reusable silicone fetus with a replaceable neural placode, allowing repeated simulations with minimal setup changes. Using an Intuitive® robotic surgical system, both dissection and closure techniques were performed. Each session was recorded and reviewed to evaluate instrument handling, placode manipulation, and layered closure under fetal constraints. Modifications were made iteratively to both technique and setup to improve realism and usability.
resultsSimulations enabled refinement of robotic fetal MMC repair techniques. Procedural progress included ideal port positioning, wristed instrument angles, and strategies for minimizing placode tension during closure. The floating model provided consistent intraoperative dynamics that supported deliberate practice and technical iteration.
conclusionRobotic-assisted fetal MMC repair is technically feasible and benefits from targeted simulation. This platform facilitated iterative learning, optimized workflow, and identified procedural challenges unique to fetal robotics. As robotic techniques advance, such simulation tools will be critical for training, standardization, and safe clinical translation of emerging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.