ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the neurophysiological mechanisms linking visual body perception to motor output in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), specifically examining how altered body schema influences corticospinal excitability. A two-stage paradigm was employed in participants with AIS and healthy controls. First, psychophysical thresholds for detecting spinal curvature were estimated. Second, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the primary motor cortex (100-125 ms post-stimulus) to assess motor system reactivity to body-relevant stimuli. Corticospinal excitability was recorded via motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from intrinsic hand muscles as a proxy for motor readiness during the observation of spinal distortions. Results revealed that AIS patients exhibited significantly lower perceptual thresholds than controls, indicating hypersensitivity to spinal curvature that correlated with subjective self-perception (Trunk Appearance Perception Scale; TAPS). TAPS scores did not correlate significantly with participants' Cobb angles, indicating that subjective body schema distortion operates independently of mechanical deformity severity. In addition, TMS revealed that AIS patients reached peak corticospinal excitability at their lower perceptual threshold, whereas healthy controls demonstrated peak excitability only when spinal curvatures exceeded their detection thresholds. These findings suggest that AIS involves an increased corticospinal gain in response to body-relevant stimuli. Rather than serving purely as a detection mechanism, the motor system in AIS exhibits a heightened readiness that is tightly coupled with the perception of spinal distortions. Such sensorimotor reorganization suggests that motor excitability is adaptively recalibrated to the patient's lived physical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.