Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Preoperative Prediction of Submental Liposuction Volume Using Outpatient-Accessible Measures: A Single-Center Pilot Study Employing the Syringe Technique.
Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyringe liposuction is widely used for submental contouring in office-based practice because it requires simple equipment and can be performed under local anesthesia. However, there is little quantitative guidance for setting target aspirated volume based on universally obtainable preoperative findings. This study aimed to develop and internally evaluate a regression equation to preoperatively predict aspirated volume using only outpatient-accessible measures.
methodsIn this single-center prospective observational study, we analyzed 63 consecutive patients who underwent submental liposuction with the syringe technique between January and August 2025, all operated on by a single surgeon. Preoperative variables included vertical length, transverse width, caliper-based skinfold thickness at the neck base, palpation-based subcutaneous firmness (score 1-3), and body mass index (BMI). The primary outcome was aspirated volume (mL) measured in the syringe at the end of the procedure. Pearson correlations were calculated, followed by multiple linear regression using the least squares method. For clinical practicality, skinfold thickness, vertical length, BMI, and firmness were selected as explanatory variables for the final prediction model. Model performance was summarized using MAE and RMSE, and internal validation was performed using bootstrap optimism correction.
resultsThe cohort comprised 53 women (84.1%) and 10 men, with a median age of 26.0 years. Mean skinfold thickness was 12.3±3.6 mm, mean vertical length 3.7±0.6 cm, median BMI 21.4, and median aspirated volume 19.0 mL. Aspirated volume correlated positively with skinfold thickness (r=0.639), vertical length (r=0.587), and BMI (r=0.466), and negatively with firmness (r=-0.386). The multiple regression model showed good fit (R
conclusionsA practical regression equation based solely on simple outpatient measurements predicts submental liposuction volume with moderate accuracy. This model may support standardized planning of target aspirated volume and provide a quantitative basis for education and patient counseling in office-based aesthetic practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.