SynthesisEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Ictal electroencephalography and heart rate as treatment criteria in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecades before the emergence of precision medicine, psychiatrists raised the question of whether specific seizure characteristics could help optimize electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), as relationships between some of these characteristics and better outcomes were found. From 1990 onward, researchers focused on electroencephalography (EEG) and cardiovascular markers, which were broadly adopted by guidelines worldwide. However, the prognostic value of these markers is still controversial. Here, we provide a systematic summary of the studies on this topic.
methodsWe conducted a literature review on the use of ictal EEG and heart rate as outcome predictors in ECT using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases.
resultsThirty-seven studies addressing more than 100 quality markers fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Single EEG markers were assigned to five categories (postictal inhibition, amplitude, coherence, regularity, and seizure duration). Heart rate and composite markers were considered separately. In contrast to single EEG markers, heart rate and composite markers could be consistently linked to better outcomes in patients with depression. Only a few studies on schizophrenia could be retrieved.
conclusionMultiparametric markers outperformed single markers. Furthermore, changes in heart rate during seizures were related to better outcomes. Although clinical assessment remains the cornerstone of treatment guidance decisions, EEG and cardiac monitoring could help prevent insufficient seizures during the period preceding clinical improvement. Evidence on schizophrenia remains limited. More randomized trials are needed to analyze the role of composite markers as prognostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.