SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
GERD remission and safety profile of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy (SG): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is widely recognized for its association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and reduced sustained weight loss in the long term. The Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass was introduced as an alternative to enhance the metabolic benefits of SG, improve GERD outcomes, address nutritional challenges of ileal bypasses, and maintain duodenal access.
methodsThis study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative safety and efficacy of SASI bypass vs SG. A literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identified 234 articles after duplicate removal. Primary outcomes were GERD remission and complication rates over the follow-up period of each study including all complications reported by the authors, while secondary outcomes included weight loss and obesity-related condition remission.
resultsThirteen studies, including 2 RCTs and eleven observational studies, analyzed 960 SG and 396 SASI bypass patients. SASI bypass showed significantly higher GERD remission (OR 7.64; 95% CI [2.81; 20.78]; P < 0.001; I
conclusionSASI bypass offers superior GERD remission over SG but with potentially higher associated morbidity. Both techniques effectively promote weight loss and obesity-related condition remission, with SASI having a slight metabolic advantage due to intestinal bypass. Further research including prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.