ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Burden of and risk factors for neurological complications in critical illness.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurological complications are common in critical illness and are increasingly recognized as major contributors to morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability among patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Even in the absence of a primary neurological diagnosis, systemic critical illness can exert substantial physiological stress on the brain through hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, inflammation, and metabolic derangements. Delirium, stroke, seizures, and neuromuscular disorders represent frequent neurological manifestations of multi-organ dysfunction and are associated with prolonged ICU stay, persistent cognitive deficits, and impaired neuropsychological and functional recovery. Recognition of modifiable risk factors has led to targeted strategies such as standardized delirium screening, judicious sedative use, and mitigation of environmental contributors including immobility, sleep disruption, and sensory impairment. However, variability in definitions, surveillance practices, and outcome measures limits precise estimation of the true burden and may contribute to ongoing underrecognition. In addition, an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of neurological injury and recovery involving the brain, peripheral nerves, and skeletal muscle further hinders progress in this field. This review synthesizes current evidence on the epidemiology, phenotypes, and risk factors of neurological complications in critical illness, highlighting key knowledge gaps and the current limitations in causal inference and therapeutic evidence, and identifying priorities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.