ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Rationalizing Heterogeneity in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Current Progress and Future Goals.
Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical and biological heterogeneity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) continue to pose significant challenges for the clinical management of individual patients and for research efforts. We contend that investigating SAB as a single disease is impeding the identification of beneficial therapeutic approaches. Recently, three data-driven approaches for patient stratification in SAB have been reported, using routinely available data to identify clinically distinct subphenotypes with differences in mortality, microbiologic outcomes, and response to adjunctive antimicrobial therapies (the Swets et al, FEN-AUREUS, and MRSA-GEIRAS-SEIMC studies). In this review, we compare the methodologies and findings from these studies, discuss their limitations, and identify goals for future research in this space. We expect that transformative advances in SAB management will only be achieved by addressing clinical and biological heterogeneity, enabling progress from observable clinical subphenotypes to mechanism-based endotypes defined by treatable traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.